In the week before the third session of the
Union Peace Conference - 21st Century Panglong, The Irrawaddy published an interview with Dr. Lian H. Sakhong on why
peace is so elusive in Myanmar. As vice-chairman of the Union Peace Dialogue
Joint Committee (UPDJC) and vice-chairman of the Chin National Front (CNF), Dr.
Lian has been intensely involved in the peace process from the very beginning.
In the interview, Dr. Lian spoke passionately about the root cause why Myanmar
has not reached peace yet, the hurdles to overcome and how to overcome them, and
the need for decisive leadership in the peace process.
Dr. Lian identified the failure to establish
a union based on the principles of democracy, equality, and self-determination,
as was envisioned in the 1947 Panglong Agreement, as the root cause of the
problems Myanmar has been facing since independence. He argued that the
country’s main barrier to peace is the same today as it was in the last 70
years as successive governments have failed to address the issue through either
political negotiations or constitutional reform. According to Dr. Lian, a lack
of collective effort by political leaders to clearly define the principles of democracy
and federalism also has blurred their meanings for the people of Myanmar over
time.
Nonetheless, Dr. Lian pointed out that the
current Nationwide Ceasefire Agreement (NCA) aims to address the aforementioned
issue and should therefore be considered as a real achievement that results
from years of effort by Myanmar’s government, military, ethnic armed
organizations (EAOs), and political parties to jointly address the country’s
political problem. The subsequent peace process, however, has not yet made as
much progress as hoped.
Dr. Lian acknowledged that the signing of the
NCA provided the EAOs with unprecedented opportunities to express and propose their
political demands to the government and the military, as well as to the people
of Myanmar, through meetings, political dialogues, media, publications, and
other means. However, as Dr. Lian believes that the military and the government
led by the National League for Democracy (NLD) have already fully understood
the demands of the EAOs, he requested both of them to decide what exactly they
can accept, what they cannot accept, and what will take time for them to
consider. According to Dr. Lian, the decision is now in the hands of the
government and the military.
Dr. Lian marked the lack of trust between the
government and the military, and between the military and the EAOs as the underlying
obstacle to moving forward in the peace process. He attributed the fact that all
parties have their own interpretations of the terms “democratic rights”, “equality”,
“self-determination”, and “federalism”, and of the decisions made during the UPDJC
meetings to a lack of trust. Dr. Lian then made four suggestions to all
stakeholders to build and strengthen trust.
Firstly, Dr. Lian suggested to strengthen the
trust between the NLD-led government and the military arguing that they now appear
to be two governments with different voices in addressing the ethnic issues. He
believes that peace negotiations to solve the ethnic issues will not be smooth
and easy until the government and the military have held talks and can speak
with the same voice.
Secondly,
Dr. Lian suggested to strengthen the trust between the military and the EAOs. He
noted that the inability to solve the issue of non-secession is a clear example
of why both sides do not seem able to build trust. As Dr. Lian strongly promotes
the principles of federalism, he reiterated that federal principles have
nothing to do with secession and that the EAOs collectively decided to stop demanding
the right to secede in 2005 as the demand only encouraged misunderstandings, suspicion,
and doubt between them and the military. Moreover, the demand would only lead
to more problems for the EAOs rather than to better protection of their rights.
Dr. Lian argued that the issue of non-secession could only be overcome by
establishing national equality and self-determination within the Union.
Thirdly,
Dr. Lian suggested to strengthen the trust between the top leaders of the government,
the military, and the EAOs. He claimed that while holding a series of meetings
at the technical level is important and appreciated, these meetings lack the
power and rights to make binding decisions. Dr. Lian argued that it is therefore
crucial to hold meetings with the top leaders of all parties as these meetings will
have the capacity to strengthen trust between all stakeholders and to overcome
the current political impasses in the peace process, such as non-secession and security
sector reform.
Fourthly and lastly, Dr. Lian suggested to strengthen
the trust of the eleven EAOs that have not yet signed the NCA with the government.
He argued that as the non-signatories are following the peace process closely,
they will only have the confidence to participate in the peace process if they
can see that the NCA is strictly observed, that the peace negotiators work together
in a framework of political dialogue based on the NCA, that all decisions made
during the UPDJC meetings are being realized, and that all peace negotiators work
freely and peacefully in accordance with the framework. According to Dr. Lian,
however, these conditions have not yet been fulfilled, with the national-level
political dialogues, the public consultations, and the venues needed for these being
restricted.
As Dr. Lian strongly believes in the power of
negotiation, he stated that in his opinion “nothing is impossible”, meaning
that there is no political problem in Myanmar that cannot be solved by
political negotiations. Dr. Lian believes that peace is possible and that it can
even be achieved within a few hours if the peace negotiators have a genuine will
to reach it. He argued that Myanmar has a strong need for a decisive leader
such as General Aung San, who courageously and sincerely took the political
decision to build a union based on the principles of democracy, equality, and
self-determination that would protect all people in the country. He then
expressed his hope that either the Senior General of the Military, Daw Aung San
Suu Kyi, the President, or an ethnic leader will become such a decisive leader.
In the
interview, Dr. Lian pointed out that the 1947 Panglong Agreement and the 2015 NCA
are closely related to each other. So far, these two agreements are the only
documents Myanmar possesses to support the building of a peaceful democratic federal
union for its entire population. Although Panglong’s promises of democracy,
equality and self-determination have not yet been realized, the current
political dialogue based on the NCA, best known as the Union Peace Conference -
21st Century Panglong, aims to address these issues without harming
the military and the EAOs. According to Dr. Lian, however, a decisive leader is
needed to move the peace process forward, just as the Panglong Conference of
1947 needed a decisive leader such as General Aung San.
The
Irrawaddy’s interview with Dr.
Lian H. Sakhong is available at: https://www.irrawaddy.com/in-person/why-peace-is-so-elusive.html